|
A member of the To'hajiilee
Chapter of the Navajo Nation waits in line to cast her ballot.
(attribution Getty Images)
|
The Native vote is vital in the 2020 election because our tribal
sovereignty, lands, water, and the well-being of our people hinge
on the outcome. But the Native vote is the most difficult vote to
win. To understand why, we have to discuss the complex history of
Native citizenship and voting rights to know how they continue to
impact our current political realities.
According to the 2010 census, 5.2 million people identified as
Native American or Alaskan Native, meaning that the entire Native
population accounts for just under 2% of the U.S. population. It's
essential to understand that the Native population's size directly
correlates to the misrepresentation and underrepresentation of Native
people when it comes to U.S. politics.
It is no mistake or coincidence that the misrepresentation and
underrepresentation that we face stem from the inherent anti-Native
policies that not only contributed to the decimation of our population
but continue to disenfranchise Native voters. After all, it's only
been 96 years since all Natives gained U.S. citizenship through
the passing of the Indian
Citizen Act of 1924. Before enacting the ICA, the U.S. had only
extended citizenship to Native people under exacting terms. For
example, in 1830, the Treaty
of Dancing Rabbit Creek granted citizenship to Mississippi Choctaws
that chose not to leave their ancestral homelands under the Indian
Removal Act, if they agreed to register for land allotments and
maintained a residence on that land for five years.
Twenty-six years later, in regards to the Supreme Court's ruling
on Dred
Scott v. Sandford, Chief Justice Roger Taney declared:
"They [the Indian tribes] may without doubt, like the subjects
of any foreign government, be naturalized by the authority of Congress
and become citizens of a state and of the United States, and if
an individual should leave his nation or tribe, and take up his
abode among the white population, he would be entitled to all the
rights and privileges which would belong to an emigrant from any
other foreign people."
In the years following Dred Scott v. Sandford, Natives were
able to gain citizenship by doing precisely that, marrying white
settlers, accepting land allotments, relinquishing their tribal
identities, and leaving their tribal communities.
Let that sink in for a moment and try to understand what Native
people were expected and forced to sacrifice to be citizens, to
have basic human, land, and water rights on our own lands.
The Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek didn't just grant Choctaws a
pathway to citizenship or allow them to maintain their ancestral
homelands. The Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek ceded 11 million acres
of their lands in exchange for a promised 15 million acres in Indian
Territory, now known as Oklahoma. It was a compromise meant to make
removal easier for the U.S government, and it did. In 1831, the
first Choctaws to be removed began their journey from Mississippi
to the Indian territory, which ushered in the beginning of the Trail
of Tears. In the 10 years following, the Choctaws, who remained
in Mississippi, were harassed, abused, and murdered. The land allotments
and citizenship promised tied up in legal conflicts to intimidate
and push them out because, at this point in our history, the mindset
was not to include Natives; it was to eradicate the "Indian
Problem."
In 1924, when the U.S. government enacted the Indian Citizenship
Act, it wasn't because of a moral awakening. It was because they
could no longer deny citizenship to Native people without drawing
the U.S. public and foreign allies' ire after the significant contributions
and sacrifices that Native communities made for the U.S. during
World War I. While the U.S. could no longer deny citizenship, they
did hope that it would forcibly assimilate Natives into American
society. They also intentionally excluded the guaranteed right to
vote, leaving it up to the states to decide. The guaranteed right
to vote was a 40-year battle that Natives had to fight state by
state, but the victory was never cut and dry. Despite winning the
right to vote, voting was nearly impossible because of literacy
tests, poll taxes, and violence meant to intimidate and prevent
them from voting.
It wasn't until the Voting
Rights Act was passed in 1965 that Natives could exercise their
right to vote more freely.
However, in 2020, voter suppression is still rife within Indian
Country. Voter suppression is a huge hurdle, but political parties
and their candidates and the state of the fragile Nation-to-Nation
relationships that we have with the U.S. government have further
disenfranchised Native voters.
According to the National
Congress of American Indians, 34% or roughly 1.2 million Natives
are not registered to vote, and voter turnout ranges from 1-10%
lower than other racial/ethnic groups. There are many barriers that
Native communities face that also contribute to this, such as the
lack of transportation to and from polling stations and voter ID
laws that prevent Natives living in rural communities that don't
have traditional addresses from registering to vote. But these obstacles
pale in comparison to the tactics of political parties and candidates
to win the Native vote and the rebelliousness of potential Native
voters choosing to abstain because they do not want to be complicit
in a political system that seeks to oppress and eradicate their
existence.
They aren't wrong. Natives choosing to abstain from voting are
not naive or misguided. Their reasons are valid because history,
past and present, continues a pattern of anti-Indigeneity through
local, state, and federal policies that promote the segregation,
assimilation, integration, expulsion, and extermination of Indigenous
peoples. There hasn't been a year in our history when we haven't
been fighting for fundamental human rights or fighting for our land
and water. Our realities and histories are why election years are
hard for a lot of Native people. We see through the hype and will
not be swayed by empty promises or catchy platitudes.
Especially in this election year, when we must choose between two
presidential candidates who have engaged in problematic and violent
behavior towards women and Native communities. We need the Native
vote, but to encourage that vote, we need to be honest.
Neither candidate is ideal for Indian Country or even the Nation.
But only one is hell-bent on destroying what little progress we
have made in the last 244 years for BIPOC and marginalized communities.
Only one is sowing division and enacting violence upon U.S. citizens
for exercising their constitutionally protected rights. Only one
is seeking to destroy the possibility of life, liberty, and justice
for all.
As Native people, we need to vote. Not because we are told it is
sacred, not because we are told to vote as if our ancestors are
watching. We need to vote and exercise the power they have so desperately
tried to suppress because they need us to abstain in order to maintain
a position of power and hold power over us through the policies
that they support.
We need to block out the voices trying to put a positive spin on
the choices before us and trying to convince us that they have our
best interest at heart. We need to be unflinchingly honest, critical,
and hold them accountable for their behavior and policies.
We need to vote, knowing that regardless of who wins, we will still
be fighting against the policies and injustices of the next administration.
We will still be taking to the courts and to the streets to fight
for equality, justice, and the better world we know is possible.
Vote because even in that future, our vote will still be our power.
Known as the Brown Ball of Fury, Johnnie Jae (Choctaw and Otoe-Missouria)
is the founder of A Tribe Called Geek, an award-winning media platform
for Indigenous Geek Culture and STEM. She is a co-founding board
member of Not Your Mascots and LiveIndigenousOK. She regularly appears
as a commentator on the Real News Networks Stir Crazy: First
Nation Fridays.
Prism
Prism is a BIPOC-led nonprofit news outlet that centers the people,
places and issues currently underreported by our national media.
Through our original reporting, analysis, and commentary, we challenge
dominant, toxic narratives perpetuated by the mainstream press and
work to build a full and accurate record of whats happening
in our democracy. Follow us on Twitter,
Facebook, and
Instagram.
https://www.prismreports.org
|